Rice authorized National Security Agency to spy on UN Security Council
in run-up to war, former officials say
Filed by Jason Leopold
President Bush and other top officials in his administration used the
National Security Agency to secretly wiretap the home and office
telephones and monitor private email accounts of members of the United
Nations Security Council in early 2003 to determine how foreign
delegates would vote on a U.N. resolution that paved the way for the
U.S.-led war in Iraq, NSA documents show.
Two former NSA officials familiar with the agency's campaign to spy on
U.N. members say then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice
authorized the plan at the request of President Bush, who wanted to
know how delegates were going to vote. Rice did not immediately return
a call for comment.
The former officials said Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld also
participated in discussions about the plan, which involved "stepping
up" efforts to eavesdrop on diplomats.
A spokeswoman at the White House who refused to give her name also
would not comment, and pointed to a March 3, 2003 press briefing by
former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer when questions about
U.N. spying were first raised.
"As a matter of long-standing policy, the administration never
comments on anything involving any people involved in intelligence,"
Fleischer said. "So I'm not saying yes and I'm not saying no."
Disclosure of the wiretaps and the monitoring of U.N. members' email
came on the eve of the Iraq war in the British-based Observer. The
leak -- which the paper acquired in the form of an email via a British
translator -- came amid a U.S. push urging U.N. members to vote in
favor of a resolution that said Iraq was in violation of
U.N. resolution 1441, asserting that it had failed to rid the country
of weapons of mass destruction.
News of the NSA spying on the U.N. received scant coverage in U.S.
newspapers at the time. But with the explosive domestic spying report
published in the New York Times last week, a closer examination of
pre-war spying may shed light on whether the Bush administration has
used the NSA for its own political purposes, as opposed to tracking
down communications regarding potential terrorist threats against the
The leaked NSA email detailing the agency's spy tactics against the
U.N. was written Jan. 31, 2003 by Chief of Staff for Regional Targets
Frank Koza. In the email, Koza asked an undisclosed number of NSA and
British intelligence officials to "pay attention to existing non-UN
Security Council Member UN-related and domestic comms (home and office
telephones) for anything useful related to Security Council
One intelligence source who spoke to RAW STORY said top White House
officials and some Republican members of Congress had debated in
December 2002 whether to step up the surveillance of U.N. officials to
include eavesdropping on home telephone and personal email accounts.
Some feared that in the event it was discovered, it would further
erode relations between the U.S. and the U.N.
The source added that U.S. spying on the U.N. isn't new.
"It's part of the job," the intelligence source said. "Everyone knows
it's being done."
Eavesdropping on U.N. diplomats is authorized under the U.S. Foreign
Intelligence Services Act. However, it's still considered a violation
of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, which says that "The
receiving state shall permit and protect free communication on the
part of the mission for all official purposes. The official
correspondence of the mission shall be inviolable."
According to one former official, "The administration pushed the
envelope by tapping their home phones."
Koza's email, a copy of which is included at the end of this report,
says the "Agency is mounting a surge particularly directed at the UN
Security Council (UNSC) members (minus US and GBR of course) for
insights as to how to membership is reacting to the on-going debate
RE: Iraq, plans to vote on any related resolutions, what related
policies/ negotiating positions they may be considering, alliances/
"The whole gamut of information that could give US policymakers an
edge in obtaining results favorable to U.S. goals or to head off
surprises. In RT, that means a QRC surge effort to revive/ create
efforts against UNSC members Angola, Cameroon, Chile, Bulgaria and
Guinea, as well as extra focus on Pakistan UN matters."
Koza's email was sent out to NSA and British intelligence officials
through a top secret surveillance network set up by the NSA, the
British Government Communication Headquarters and similar intelligence
agencies based in Australia, New Zealand and Canada known as Echelon.
Moreover, the email was distributed just four days after Hans Blix
filed his Iraq weapons report with the U.N.
It was leaked to a handful of media outlets in the U.S. and U.K. by
Katharine Tersea Gun, a former translator for British intelligence.
Gun was arrested in November 2003 and charged with violating her
country's Official Secrets Act. She said she felt compelled to leak
the memo because she believed the U.S. and Britain were about to
launch an illegal war.
"Any disclosures that may have been made were justified on the
following grounds: because they exposed serious illegality and
wrongdoing on the part of the U.S. Government who attempted to subvert
our own security services and, to prevent wide-scale death and
casualties among ordinary Iraqi people and UK forces in the course of
an illegal war," she said in a statement at the time.
In his book "Plan of Attack," Bob Woodward, deputy managing editor of
the Washington Post, said the administration was also spying on Hans
Blix, the U.N. weapons inspector sent to Iraq to look for WMDs.
"One of the things that's gone unnoticed is national intelligence
assets spying on Hans Blix," Woodward told the Council on Foreign
Relations on June 9, 2004 "And Bush was getting these reports and felt
that there was incongruity between what Blix was saying publicly and
what he was actually doing. It makes it very clear we were wiretapping
In an article for Counterpunch, media critic Norman Solomon noted that
the U.S. media barely covered the U.N. spying.
"Nearly 96 hours after the Observer had reported it, I called Times
deputy foreign editor Alison Smale and asked why not," Solomon
writes. "'We would normally expect to do our own intelligence
reporting,' Smale replied. She added that 'we could get no
confirmation or comment.' In other words, U.S. intelligence officials
refused to confirm or discuss the memo -- so the Times did not see fit
to report on it."
The Washington Post printed a 514-word article on a back page with the
headline "Spying Report No Shock to U.N," while the Los Angeles Times
emphasized from the outset that U.S. spy activities at the United
Nations are "long-standing," Solomon wrote.
Solomon says his research turned up only one story which took the
spying seriously -- a Mar. 4, 2003 piece in the Baltimore Sun.
The leaked NSA email which revealed the spying follows.
To: [Recipients withheld] From: FRANK KOZA, Def Chief of Staff
(Regional Targets) CIV/NSA Sent on Jan 31 2003 0:16 Subject:
Reflections of Iraq Debate/Votes at UN-RT Actions + Potential for
Related Contributions Importance: HIGH Top Secret//COMINT//X1 All, As
you've likely heard by now, the Agency is mounting a surge
particularly directed at the UN Security Council (UNSC) members (minus
US and GBR of course) for insights as to how to membership is reacting
to the on-going debate RE: Iraq, plans to vote on any related
resolutions, what related policies/ negotiating positions they may be
considering, alliances/ dependencies, etc -- the whole gamut of
information that could give US policymakers an edge in obtaining
results favorable to US goals or to head off surprises. In RT, that
means a QRC surge effort to revive/ create efforts against UNSC
members Angola, Cameroon, Chile, Bulgaria and Guinea, as well as extra
focus on Pakistan UN matters. We've also asked ALL RT topi's to
emphasize and make sure they pay attention to existing non-UNSC member
UN-related and domestic comms for anything useful related to the UNSC
deliberations/ debates/ votes. We have a lot of special UN-related
diplomatic coverage (various UN delegations) from countries not
sitting on the UNSC right now that could contribute related
perspectives/ insights/ whatever. We recognize that we can't afford to
ignore this possible source. We'd appreciate your support in getting
the word to your analysts who might have similar, more in-direct
access to valuable information from accesses in your product lines. I
suspect that you'll be hearing more along these lines in formal
channels - especially as this effort will probably peak (at least for
this specific focus) in the middle of next week, following the
SecState's presentation to the UNSC. Thanks for your help.
(Note: Slight edit made for clarification purposes.)
NOTE: For more telecom/internet/networking/computer news from the
daily media, check out our feature 'Telecom Digest Extra' each day at
http://telecom-digest.org/td-extra/more-news.html . Hundreds of new
articles daily. And, discuss this and other topics in our forum at
*** FAIR USE NOTICE. This message contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This Internet discussion group is making it available without
profit to group members who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving the included information in their efforts to advance the
understanding of literary, educational, political, and economic
issues, for non-profit research and educational purposes only. I
believe that this constitutes a 'fair use' of the copyrighted material
as provided for in section 107 of the U.S. Copyright Law. If you wish
to use this copyrighted material for purposes of your own that go
beyond 'fair use,' you must obtain permission from the copyright
owner, in this instance, Seattle Post-Intelligencer.
For more information go to: