|Re: Vonage Complaining Of VoIP 'Blocking'|
|Tony P. (firstname.lastname@example.org)|
Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:01:09 -0500
In article <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org says:|
>>> Isn't that still the case?
>> Yep, and by those rules Cox shouldn't be considered a common carrier
> Cox, being a cable company, isn't a common carrier and never has been.
> Why do you think they are?
Cox hasn't been just a cable company for at least the past five years.
|Post Followup Article||Use your browser's quoting feature to quote article into reply|
|Go to Next message: email@example.com: "Re: The Move to High-Tech Tracking of Inmates"|
|Go to Previous message: Tim@Backhome.org: "Re: Man Dies Waiting for 911 to Arrive"|
|May be in reply to: Jack Decker: "Vonage Complaining Of VoIP 'Blocking'"|
|Next in thread: Scott Dorsey: "Re: Vonage Complaining Of VoIP 'Blocking'"|
|TELECOM Digest: Home Page|